Filed under: Uncategorized
Rick Tormala enters the mayoral Race. Here is his campaign announcement:
Grand Rapids is a great city but our future hangs in the balance. Cuts in vital services have tarnished our public image and placed the public safety and quality of life in our neighborhoods at risk. Downtown and Michigan Hill are flourishing while our neighborhoods suffer. We need to find solutions not scapegoats. After being encouraged by citizens throughout our City and with the support of my family I am announcing today my candidacy for the office of Mayor of Grand Rapids.
I run in the name of the citizens of our neighborhoods some of whom feel neglected and ignored. I run in the name of working families, seniors, and the vulnerable who struggle every day to make ends meet and want a fiscally responsible budget for our city supplying them with the vital services they need and expect. And, on a personal note, I run in the name of my Father, Dick Tormala, who served the Park Department that he loved, faithfully and effectively for 28 years until his untimely death and who taught me that public service is a worthy vocation and that you always have to do the right thing regardless of the consequences.
Four years of weak and ineffective leadership by Mayor Heartwell have created a vacuum of leadership at City Hall that has been filled by an entrenched bureaucracy. As a result priorities are more often dictated by staff rather than the City Commission. Whether it is the bungled and unwise proposed sale of public park property, the elimination of vital police and firefighter positions, the closing of pools and park restrooms while millions of dollars beyond the need of bonding requirements are placed in surplus savings accounts, it is clear the priorities and needs of our citizens are not being met. When a Mayor rubberstamps the policy proposed by the City Manager the majority of Commissioners are inclined to follow without major challenges. George Heartwell has been the Manager’s Mayor. I will be the Mayor of the people. My campaign will be a referendum on who runs this City– an entrenched bureaucracy or the elected representatives of the people.
There are clear differences between myself and George Heartwell. Even people who disagree with me admit I get things done, tell it like it is, fight for what I believe is right, and don’t flip flop on issues. Whether it was defeating the Town Hall proposal (saving the taxpayers $11 million dollars in construction costs), creating the Public Safety Committee, cleaning up the Assessor’s office, helping fix our 911 Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) problems, preserving GLR funds for seniors, children, families, neighborhoods, and other human service organizations, and establishing criteria to legally protect our city and provide transparency when dealing with confidentiality agreements to name a few accomplishments, I have proved my ability to effectively lead and take on the bureaucrats.
As Mayor I would push for fully restoring all of our vital services, including hiring the number of police officers and firefighters necessary to keep our neighborhoods safe. Not only would I support opening all pools, parks facilities, recreational programs, and public restrooms on an annual basis; but also will call for the reconstruction of Garfield Park’s swimming pool and the openings of it’s lodge and gym. I will also call for fully funding and implementing our successful 21st Century Infrastructure program to ensure every neighborhood has streets as good as the ones downtown.
As Mayor I would establish a Citizen’s Budget Advisory Committee and charge them with reviewing the entire budget by justifying or removing every job and service in order to help the City Commission achieve the lean and efficient government we need to restore fiscal integrity to our budget. Additionally, I would create a Economic Climate Committee to review all city polices and streamline red tape to ensure all unreasonable impediments are removed that would discourage businesses from locating or remaining in Grand Rapids and to make recommendations on new job creation tools.
As Mayor I will also establish a city wide strategy to address the problems of violence, drugs and gang activity in our neighborhoods. We would work in tangent with our schools to provide recreational opportunities, mentoring programs, keeping open the Paul I. Phillips and other youth centers, job training and substance abuse treatment for our City’s children and young adults. Additionally, I’m calling for the creation of a Regional Anti-Gang Task Force comprised of the Grand Rapids Police Department, the Kent County Sheriff’s Department and every school district and law enforcement agency in West Michigan to take back our neighborhoods and prevent violence. I would also propose the City of Grand Rapids become the regional provider of fire staffing and 911 Dispatch.
I would raise revenue for my initiatives by the following measures:
1) Savings from the consolidation of services and the efficient restructuring of our budget.
2) The leasing of a portion of our Parking System facilities and the sale of surplus city property which could bring in tens of millions of dollars
3) Utilizing surplus millions in our Engineering and Parking Systems Enterprise Funds while pushing the Downtown Development Authority to pay for a portion of our Police and Fire budgets. We must build a pipeline to bring money from our flourishing downtown to directly help serve our neighborhoods.
4) Advocate for state and federal funding increases.
5) And finally if all other avenues have been exhausted, and all fat eliminated from our city budget, as a last resort go to our citizens for a reasonable income tax increase.
Mr. Kimball and Mr. Heartwell are good men, but we have a different philosophy of how this city should be run and how you present a tax proposal to our citizens and secure their support. I believe the City Commission should first set budget priorities and then the City Manager should design a budget reflecting those priorities. Mr. Kimball and Mr. Heartwell believe our citizens have to feel the pain of budget cuts before they will support a tax increase. I have more faith in our taxpayers’ judgement. I believe we should use our surplus to fund necessary services, cut or eliminate everything in our budget that is a want not a need, and then go to the public honestly explaining our situation, backing it up with all pertinent facts and trusting in their common sense and concern for our city to pass the proposal.
A tax increase should always be a last resort, after all other avenues of revenue and reduction have been exhausted. However if there were a need and all the aforementioned criteria were met I would as Mayor lead a campaign for a tax increase unlike Mr. Heartwell who floats trial balloons and then backs down
I look forward to a vigorous campaign of issues and ideas. It should be a hard fought campaign centered on the public records, positions, and accomplishments of all the candidates. The Office of Mayor of Grand Rapids will not be a prize awarded to the highest bidder. To that end I am calling for all candidates to sit down and discuss implementing and abiding by a mutually agreeable self imposed campaign spending limit as well as committing to a series of public debates and forums. As the self proclaimed “unbeatable” candidate Mayor Heartwell with more name recognition than anyone else and all the powers of incumbency should be willing to run for office on his merits not his money. As for myself I have always been comfortable in the role of a hard working underdog placing my faith in God and the wisdom of the citizens of Grand Rapids
1 Comment so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
You may ask why a candidate is featuring another candidate’s campaign announcement statement on his own website. Well, if you read Mr. Tormala’s statement, you will realize he is bereft of any real ideas to lead this city forward. I have reviewed Mr. Tormala’s statement, and wanted the voters to have the opportunity to do the same. More importantly, aside from being a mayoral candidate myself, I am a resident of Grand Rapids and see several pressing issues in Tormala’s statement and I feel that the voters deserve to understand my position on these important issues.
Comment by Jim Rinck May 25, 2007 @ 4:32 pmTormala’s first idea to improve fiscal solvency in the city of Grand Rapids is to sell our parking ramps. This one-time sale will bring $35 – $45 million in revenue to the city. Our parking ramps and lots provide anywhere from $5 – $7 million per year in income, and they are well run and well maintained by good city employees. Selling them would be a one-time financial fix and would be the moral equivalent of eating your own seed corn. In fact, according to city manager Kurt Kimball, the city still owes on the bonds utilized to purchase this property. The city would stand to lose money and equity in the sale. Also, how we are going to replace the ongoing revenue is the missing part of the Tormala equation?
Tormala’s plan includes several levels of ways to pay for his spending plan. Unfortunately, these additional steps are merely a way to add some phantom distance between selling city assets and tax increases. His statement mentions a few minimalist possibilities, such as lobbying the state government to provide more money to our city. Does anybody truly believe that will happen in this current budget crisis? He then reaches to his real position, which is to immediately raise taxes on the citizens of Grand Rapids.
While no responsible political servant will ever completely eliminate the idea of raising taxes, the fact of the matter is that Mr. Tormala simply wants to sell parking ramps, raise taxes and return to business as usual, almost as if he wants to return this City to the 1950s via tax time travel. If this is the best he can do after two terms on the City Commission, you vote for him at your own risk and this city’s peril. Tormala’s statement emphasizes the ineffectiveness of the City Commission. Ironically, his attitude toward the City Commission merely highlights his ineffectiveness after spending eight years on the Commission himself. After highlighting the fact that the position of Mayor is mostly a Commissioner-at-Large, I wonder why Tormala is running for the position at all. He has had eight years to affect change as a Commissioner, and has not.
A review of my website will note that I have put forth a number of ideas to improve our city and to make it a smart and livable city; I have suggested that we start talking about multi-city involvement in providing services such as police and fire protection to improve both services and the budget. I strongly advocate that we sit down with those that are involved in the actual operation of this city, such as; the city workers, city police officers and firefighters. Mayor Heartwell has not done so in four year, and Mr. Tormala certainly has had the same opportunity. If we expect to find solutions, it will require greater diligence than simply selling revenue producing assets or raising your taxes. We MUST start thinking differently. Only one candidate for mayor is doing that, Jim Rinck.